Don't believe the claims. Recompute them.
Everything below runs in your browser over the public evidence bundle: real SHA-256, real RFC 6962 Merkle construction, the real published MIT verifier doing real Ed25519 and ML-DSA-65 signature checks. If we were lying, this page would say so.
Under 3× sustained overload, was anything accepted silently dropped, or any phantom event invented? We recompute, per tenant, the sum over all agents of head_index + 1 and check it equals the on-chain count equals the accepted count — then sum the five tenants. Real arithmetic over the real reconciliation artifact, computed now.
| Tenant | Agents | Recomputed | On-chain | Reconciles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2126d5f72838 | 3 agents | Σ(idx+1) = 24,774 | on-chain 24,774 | ✓ = accepted 24,774 |
| d9f85899ab34 | 3 agents | Σ(idx+1) = 24,935 | on-chain 24,935 | ✓ = accepted 24,935 |
| 83b13d268d3e | 3 agents | Σ(idx+1) = 25,036 | on-chain 25,036 | ✓ = accepted 25,036 |
| 2feacb7576e8 | 3 agents | Σ(idx+1) = 24,923 | on-chain 24,923 | ✓ = accepted 24,923 |
| b16d9dc2f247 | 3 agents | Σ(idx+1) = 25,132 | on-chain 25,132 | ✓ = accepted 25,132 |
| 5 tenants · 15 agents | 124,800 | = 124,800 accepted | 0 errors · byte-exact |
Proves: byte-exact ledger arithmetic — nothing accepted was dropped, no phantom events appeared. Does not prove: the signatures or the time anchor — those are tabs B and D.
Why this matters more than a certificate: a badge asserts that someone checked once. This lets anyone check continuously, offline, with software we cannot withdraw.